In Defense of Rudy
In Defense of Rudy
I've noticed of late much discussion on Rudy Giuliani. As i want to remind many of you although I live in Texas now and have for the last 17 years, I spent the first 23 years of my life 25 minutes outside of NYC. I was raised on Giuliani, where he has been on the political canvas there for many since i was small. I think the guy is great.The clatter about Rudy is regarding social issues and his lack of conservatism. But what i want to talk about is how the country and the constitution are set up. The federal goverment was set up for a common defense and commerce management. It was not set up for health care or education, or social security, basically weatlh redistribution plans. So how does Rudy fit in.Well presently we are in the middle of a war that i believe is necessary and one we must win. I will save my views on the Civil War illusion for a different article. We need a strong President that will continue on our present road, not one that spews the same mantra as Osama (not to be confused with obama). This is the single most important issue of our time. There is no person with a D after their name that will lead the US to anything but a defeat. Listen to them if you think that is an unfounded statement.So lets get back to the constitution and how it fits in for Rudy. As conservative we should want a president that is a constitutionalist. What that means is i don't really care what social issues Giuliani is for. If he doesn't try to enact laws that undercut the states rights to make their own social agendas. And if i was him that's what i would be saying. I maybe be pro choice but its not a federal issue and I will support Judges who correctly rule on constitutional issues. Correctly ruling on the constitution would over turn Roe v Wade and put the abortion discussion back in state hands, not a federal manadate.This is just one example. But lets face it, Giuliani is the only person out there that can defeat Hillary and although i do believe Newt is probabally the better person for the job, he does not have the ability to win. The Gingrich who stole christmas was pretty much the nail in the coffin.Someday maybe the Republicans will get it. You need to field viable candidates and you have to go to the polls and vote for them even if you don't agree with them on every point. Reason why you do that is because when you don't you get Nancy Pelosi, fairness doctorine and a daily telegraphing to the enemy to keep up the good work. And the next election Hillary Clinton in the Whitehouse.
I've noticed of late much discussion on Rudy Giuliani. As i want to remind many of you although I live in Texas now and have for the last 17 years, I spent the first 23 years of my life 25 minutes outside of NYC. I was raised on Giuliani, where he has been on the political canvas there for many since i was small. I think the guy is great.The clatter about Rudy is regarding social issues and his lack of conservatism. But what i want to talk about is how the country and the constitution are set up. The federal goverment was set up for a common defense and commerce management. It was not set up for health care or education, or social security, basically weatlh redistribution plans. So how does Rudy fit in.Well presently we are in the middle of a war that i believe is necessary and one we must win. I will save my views on the Civil War illusion for a different article. We need a strong President that will continue on our present road, not one that spews the same mantra as Osama (not to be confused with obama). This is the single most important issue of our time. There is no person with a D after their name that will lead the US to anything but a defeat. Listen to them if you think that is an unfounded statement.So lets get back to the constitution and how it fits in for Rudy. As conservative we should want a president that is a constitutionalist. What that means is i don't really care what social issues Giuliani is for. If he doesn't try to enact laws that undercut the states rights to make their own social agendas. And if i was him that's what i would be saying. I maybe be pro choice but its not a federal issue and I will support Judges who correctly rule on constitutional issues. Correctly ruling on the constitution would over turn Roe v Wade and put the abortion discussion back in state hands, not a federal manadate.This is just one example. But lets face it, Giuliani is the only person out there that can defeat Hillary and although i do believe Newt is probabally the better person for the job, he does not have the ability to win. The Gingrich who stole christmas was pretty much the nail in the coffin.Someday maybe the Republicans will get it. You need to field viable candidates and you have to go to the polls and vote for them even if you don't agree with them on every point. Reason why you do that is because when you don't you get Nancy Pelosi, fairness doctorine and a daily telegraphing to the enemy to keep up the good work. And the next election Hillary Clinton in the Whitehouse.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home